Quality Healthcare: Measuring Nurse Practitioner Performance

Introduction

Quality performance is a crucial administrative component and a cornerstone of quality initiatives in all health systems. Performance is quantified concerning established standards, goals, and expectations through performance metrics, which serve as a roadmap for quality improvement projects (Batalden, 2018). This paper focuses on Comprehensive Diabetic Care from the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) within the effectiveness of care domain as a performance measure. Diabetes, a chronic health problem that affects a large portion of the population, requires effective management to prevent complications and improve quality of life. This paper will discuss three strategies for comprehensive diabetes care, how to measure their effectiveness, improve patient outcomes, reduce costs, and increase patient satisfaction.

Patient Interventions for Comprehensive Diabetes Care

Intervention One: Blood Glucose Monitoring

Blood glucose monitoring is essential for managing diabetes effectively. Patients, especially those on insulin therapy, need to monitor their blood glucose levels several times daily. This intervention involves routinely measuring and documenting blood glucose levels using a blood glucose meter, with results recorded in the patient’s Electronic Health Record (EHR). Regular monitoring is crucial for adjusting treatment plans and preventing complications associated with hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia (Ajjan, 2017). The effectiveness of this intervention can be measured by reviewing the patient’s diary and EHR to assess the frequency of blood glucose checks and their adherence to scheduled visits.

Intervention Two: Lifestyle Modification

Lifestyle modification is another critical intervention, involving the development of a physical exercise program and dietary plans to aid in diabetes management. Regular physical activity and a balanced diet can significantly improve glycemic control and overall health. For this intervention, personalized physical activity plans will be created, which may include using a pedometer to track daily steps, engaging in vigorous physical activities, and adopting a diet rich in high-fiber, low-fat foods. The effectiveness of this intervention can be measured by monitoring patients' physical activity levels, dietary adherence, and subsequent changes in BMI and blood glucose levels (Azhar et al., 2021).

Intervention Three: Compliance with Medication

Medication compliance is vital for managing blood glucose levels, particularly when lifestyle modifications alone are insufficient. This intervention involves ensuring patients understand their medication regimens, including dosage and potential side effects. Tools such as mHealth apps for medication adherence and clear, written instructions will be provided to patients. The success of this intervention can be measured through patient surveys and self-reports on medication adherence, with particular attention to elderly patients who may require assistance from caregivers (Brahmbhatt et al., 2017).

Improved Patient Outcomes

These interventions can significantly improve patient outcomes. Regular blood glucose monitoring allows for timely adjustments in treatment, preventing complications and ensuring better glycemic control. Lifestyle modifications, such as increased physical activity and improved diet, can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and promote weight loss, enhancing insulin sensitivity and reducing the likelihood of diabetes-related complications (Mingyue et al., 2019). Medication compliance ensures that patients maintain appropriate blood glucose levels, reducing the risk of hospital readmissions and long-term complications.

Cost Savings

Effective diabetes management through these interventions can lead to substantial cost savings. Improved glycemic control reduces the need for frequent testing, hospitalizations, and the treatment of diabetes-related complications. By promoting lifestyle changes and ensuring medication adherence, healthcare providers can minimize the financial burden on both patients and healthcare systems. For instance, better blood glucose control can decrease the frequency of hospital visits and reduce the cost of diabetes management supplies (Ajjan, 2017). Additionally, preventing complications such as diabetic foot ulcers can avoid costly surgical interventions, saving significant healthcare resources (CDC, 2020).

Patient Ratings

Implementing these interventions can also enhance patient satisfaction and experience with care. By actively involving patients in their health management and providing them with the tools and support needed to succeed, healthcare providers can foster a more positive patient experience. Satisfied patients are more likely to adhere to treatment plans, resulting in better health outcomes and higher ratings for healthcare providers and facilities. For example, medication synchronization ensures patients receive their prescriptions without delay, improving their overall experience and satisfaction with care (Bidmon et al., 2020).

Conclusion

Healthcare organizations and clinicians must work to meet all six HEDIS domains of care to provide high-quality treatment and achieve positive health outcomes. Comprehensive diabetes care, including blood glucose monitoring, medication compliance, and lifestyle changes, is essential for managing diabetes effectively. These interventions can improve glycemic control, enhance patient outcomes, reduce healthcare costs, and increase patient satisfaction, ultimately leading to better ratings for healthcare providers and facilities.

References

• Ajjan, R. A. (2017). How can we realize the clinical benefits of continuous glucose monitoring?. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 19(S2), S-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081866
• Azhar, R., Uttra, K., Khan, A., Awan, M. H., Anwer, A., Lodhi, M. W., & Qureshi, M. W. (2021). Impact of physician-led lifestyle modifications (diet and daily step count by using a pedometer) on glycemic control of patients with type II diabetes. PAFMJ, 71(2), 478–81. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v71i2.2788
• Batalden, P. (2018). Getting more health from healthcare: quality improvement must acknowledge patient coproduction—an essay by Paul Batalden. BMJ, 362, k3617. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3617
• Bidmon, S., Terlutter, R., & Röttl, J. (2020). What explains usage of mobile physician-rating apps? Results from a web-based questionnaire. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), e15357. https://doi.org/10.2196/15357
• Brahmbhatt, M., Niakan, S., Saha, N., Tewari, A., Pirani, A., Keshavjee, N., & Keshavjee, K. (2017). Diabetes mHealth Apps: Designing for Greater Uptake. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 234, 49–53.
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2020). Diabetes report card 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/library/reports/reportcard.html
• Dennick, K., Sturt, J., & Speight, J. (2017). What is diabetes distress and how can we measure it? A narrative review and conceptual model. Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications, 31(5), 898–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.12.018
• Mingyue Zheng, Shenqiao Yang, Yanting Liu, Qian He, & Peng Hu. (2019). A model for physical activity behavioural change in middle-aged and older people with type 2 diabetes. E3S Web of Conferences, 78. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197801010